XSEP vs. QDTE
XSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSEP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XSEP returned 10.66% vs 40.36% for QDTE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
XSEP vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSEP achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.58% return.
XSEP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSEP vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September | 4.33% | 8.94% | 5.70% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.58% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSEP and QDTE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XSEP and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSEP vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSEP
QDTE
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XSEP
QDTE
-
Financial Services
XSEP
QDTE
Communication Services
XSEP
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSEP
QDTE
-
Healthcare
XSEP
QDTE
-
Industrials
XSEP
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
XSEP
QDTE
-
Energy
XSEP
QDTE
-
Utilities
XSEP
QDTE
-
Real Estate
XSEP
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
XSEP
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSEP vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
XSEP
QDTE
XSEP vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSEP | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.98 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.34 | 16.08 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSEP | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.74 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 1.30 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
XSEP vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEP and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSEP | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -22.86% | +13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.51% | -10.20% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.16% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -3.14% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 2.52% | -1.87% |
Volatility
XSEP vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) is 0.53%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that XSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSEP | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 3.75% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 11.01% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 14.81% | -9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 18.43% | -11.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 18.43% | -11.41% |
XSEP vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSEP vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
XSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 42.16% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
XSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSEP and QDTE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to XSEP (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSEP dropped -9.21% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 40.36% vs 10.66% for XSEP. On fees, XSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 40.36% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 42.16%, compared with 0.00% for XSEP.
XSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XSEP and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSEP and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer