XSD vs. PHO
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSD returned 30.69%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for PHO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PHO.
Performance
XSD vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 87.88% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XSD has outperformed PHO with an annualized return of 30.69%, while PHO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.78% annualized return.
XSD
- 1D
- -6.88%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 87.88%
- 6M
- 83.00%
- 1Y
- 147.65%
- 3Y*
- 43.10%
- 5Y*
- 26.73%
- 10Y*
- 30.69%
PHO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- -5.09%
- 6M
- -6.73%
- 1Y
- -3.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
XSD vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 87.88% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -5.09% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and PHO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSD and PHO has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSD vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
PHO
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSD
PHO
Energy
XSD
PHO
-
Basic Materials
XSD
-
PHO
Communication Services
XSD
-
PHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
PHO
-
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
PHO
-
Financial Services
XSD
-
PHO
Healthcare
XSD
-
PHO
Industrials
XSD
-
PHO
Real Estate
XSD
-
PHO
-
Utilities
XSD
-
PHO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
PHO
XSD vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSD | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 0.98 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | -0.24 | +8.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.27 | -0.56 | +26.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSD vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than PHO's maximum drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -55.62% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -13.78% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -19.19% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -28.60% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | -34.92% | -7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -10.33% | +3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -10.18% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 5.79% | -0.15% |
Volatility
XSD vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 22.76% compared to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) at 4.40%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.76% | 4.40% | +18.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 11.31% | +22.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.74% | 15.17% | +25.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.20% | 18.39% | +20.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.44% | 19.45% | +15.99% |
XSD vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSD vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than PHO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.61% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and PHO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to PHO (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 30.69% vs 11.78% for PHO. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 30.69% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.
XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while PHO is Water Equities. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.59% for PHO.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer