XSD vs. SMH
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - XSD tracks the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index while SMH tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSD returned 26.46%/yr vs 34.16%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XSD vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSD having a 51.72% return and SMH slightly lower at 50.09%. Over the past 10 years, XSD has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 26.46%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 34.16% annualized return.
XSD
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- 6M
- 40.73%
- YTD
- 51.72%
- 1Y
- 86.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.96%
- 10Y*
- 26.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.93%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -8.74%
- 6M
- 33.97%
- YTD
- 50.09%
- 1Y
- 90.95%
- 3Y*
- 50.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.46%
- 10Y*
- 34.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.28B | $7.64B | $7.07B | |
| $35.96M | $51.40M | $77.64M |
XSD vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 51.72% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 50.09% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and SMH is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XSD and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSD vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
SMH
Technology
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSD
SMH
Industrials
XSD
SMH
-
Energy
XSD
SMH
-
Basic Materials
XSD
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
XSD
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
XSD
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
XSD
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
XSD
-
SMH
-
Utilities
XSD
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
SMH
XSD vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 3.58 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 14.64 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSD vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -84.96% | +20.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.81% | -24.62% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -35.74% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -45.30% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | -45.30% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.95% | -19.19% | -5.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -40.89% | +27.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 6.01% | +2.26% |
Volatility
XSD vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 18.43% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.70%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.43% | 14.70% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.72% | 33.13% | +5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.32% | 38.57% | +6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.07% | 36.50% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 33.32% | +2.59% |
XSD vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSD and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XSD vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SMH's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.16% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and SMH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (18.43%) compared to SMH (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 34.16% vs 26.46% for XSD. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 14.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 34.16% return vs 26.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.16% for XSD.
XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer