XRT vs. EATZ
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ).
XRT and EATZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. EATZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 20, 2021.
Performance
XRT vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XRT vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | -5.40% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 0.49% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | -0.73% | -6.67% | 23.21% | 25.23% | -20.68% | -5.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than EATZ's -0.73% return.
XRT
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -6.19%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
EATZ
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -5.70%
- 1Y
- -4.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRT vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XRT vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank
XRT
EATZ
XRT vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRT | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | -0.23 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | -0.19 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.20 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | -0.38 | +3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRT | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | -0.23 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.07 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between XRT and EATZ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XRT vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison
XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than EATZ's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.86% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XRT vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than EATZ's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and EATZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRT | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -34.40% | -31.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -23.21% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.82% | -18.11% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.01% | -13.38% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 12.13% | -7.02% |
Volatility
XRT vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) at 5.04%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XRT | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 5.04% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 13.55% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 21.22% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 21.65% | +5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 21.65% | +5.52% |