XRT vs. EATZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. XRT is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

XRT vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XRT

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: 3.86%
• 6M: 4.50%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 1Y: 18.43%
• 3Y*: 12.43%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: 9.00%
• ALL TIME*: 9.68%

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	$433.01M	$377.95M	$454.29M

XRT vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	7.76%	8.07%	11.78%	21.53%	-31.64%	2.25%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and EATZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.70

The correlation between XRT and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRT vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRT	EATZ
Consumer Cyclical	75.2%	78.2%
Consumer Defensive	18.7%	16.9%
Technology	2.7%	-
Communication Services	1.8%	2.3%
Healthcare	1.6%	-
Energy	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XRT vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRT

XRT Risk / Return Rank: 35
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 33

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRT vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRT	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XRT	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.26%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRT	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.91%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.91%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.20%	—	—

XRT vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRT vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	0.74%	0.77%	1.52%	1.40%	2.15%	1.55%	1.01%	1.57%	1.51%	1.52%	1.36%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRT and EATZ in my portfolio?

XRT and EATZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRT or EATZ?

On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRT or EATZ?

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRT or EATZ?

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between XRT and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 1.00% for EATZ.