PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRT vs. CARZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRT vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 57.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed CARZ with an annualized return of 8.56%, while CARZ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.49% annualized return.


XRT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
8.56%

CARZ

1D
-0.37%
1M
19.08%
YTD
57.52%
6M
60.74%
1Y
116.25%
3Y*
34.19%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
16.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRT vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.99%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
57.52%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and CARZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2011

0.56

The correlation between XRT and CARZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRT vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRT
CARZ

Consumer Cyclical

73.6%
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

20.9%

-

Communication Services

1.4%
5.1%

Healthcare

1.4%

-

Technology

1.4%
60.6%

Energy

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

6.6%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRT
73.6%
CARZ
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

XRT
20.9%
CARZ

-

Communication Services

XRT
1.4%
CARZ
5.1%

Healthcare

XRT
1.4%
CARZ

-

Technology

XRT
1.4%
CARZ
60.6%

Energy

XRT
1.4%
CARZ

-

Basic Materials

XRT

-

CARZ
6.6%

Financial Services

XRT

-

CARZ

-

Industrials

XRT

-

CARZ
8.1%

Real Estate

XRT

-

CARZ

-

Utilities

XRT

-

CARZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRT vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRT vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRTCARZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.70

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

8.10

-7.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.45

32.71

-31.26

XRT vs. CARZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the CARZ Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and CARZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRTCARZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

4.53

-4.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.58

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.63

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Drawdowns

XRT vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than CARZ's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and CARZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRTCARZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-51.20%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-14.44%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-27.84%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-40.30%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-51.20%

+4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.82%

-0.37%

-13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-12.90%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

3.57%

+2.28%

Volatility

XRT vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) is 6.50%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that XRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRTCARZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

10.14%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

20.31%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

25.79%

-5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

28.11%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

26.27%

+0.89%

XRT vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRT vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than CARZ's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.35%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRT and CARZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to XRT (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs CARZ's -51.20%.

On 10-year performance, CARZ leads with 16.49% vs 8.56% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.83% for XRT.

XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRT and CARZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer