XRSS.L vs. ACCBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XRSS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and ACCBX (Invesco Corporate Bond Fund) are both funds - XRSS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while ACCBX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, XRSS.L returned 14.67%/yr vs 3.75%/yr for ACCBX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRSS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for ACCBX.

Performance

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) and Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XRSS.L is traded in GBp, while ACCBX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACCBX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRSS.L achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than ACCBX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XRSS.L has outperformed ACCBX with an annualized return of 14.67%, while ACCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.75% annualized return.

XRSS.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 6.12%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 10.27%
• 1Y: 29.91%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 14.37%
• 10Y*: 14.67%

ACCBX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 2.64%
• 5Y*: 1.04%
• 10Y*: 3.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XRSS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	10.42%	9.60%	28.26%	22.69%	-11.96%	29.11%	12.54%	25.48%	-5.60%	7.52%
ACCBX Invesco Corporate Bond Fund	0.86%	-0.31%	4.67%	1.66%	-6.82%	1.26%	8.15%	11.38%	1.55%	-2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XRSS.L and ACCBX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015	0.29

Return for Risk

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRSS.L

XRSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
XRSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
XRSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XRSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
XRSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
XRSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

ACCBX

ACCBX Risk / Return Rank: 29
ACCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
ACCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ACCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ACCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ACCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) and Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XRSS.L	ACCBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.09	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	1.65	+1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.20	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	1.30	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.44	3.31	+8.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the ACCBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRSS.L and ACCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRSS.L	ACCBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	1.09	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.12	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.39	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.62	+0.16

Drawdowns

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRSS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than ACCBX's maximum drawdown of -13.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSS.L and ACCBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRSS.L	ACCBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.00%	-13.93%	-19.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-5.49%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.42%	-9.77%	-12.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.42%	-13.93%	-8.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.00%	-13.93%	-19.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-2.83%	+2.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-4.72%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.14%	+0.47%

Volatility

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) at 1.55%. This indicates that XRSS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRSS.L	ACCBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	1.55%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.80%	5.12%	+2.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.42%	6.55%	+4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	8.80%	+6.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.75%	9.68%	+7.07%

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRSS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ACCBX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRSS.L vs. ACCBX - Dividend Comparison

XRSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACCBX Invesco Corporate Bond Fund	5.01%	4.95%	4.63%	3.78%	3.84%	4.91%	5.98%	3.67%	4.22%	4.13%	3.64%	3.88%
XRSS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRSS.L and ACCBX in my portfolio?

XRSS.L and ACCBX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.