XRSS.L vs. XZSP.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE).
XRSS.L and XZSP.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRSS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 6, 2015. XZSP.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 ESG. It was launched on Dec 6, 2022. Both XRSS.L and XZSP.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XRSS.L or XZSP.DE.
Key characteristics
| XRSS.L | XZSP.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.79% | 17.72% |
| 1Y Return | 21.31% | 23.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.69 | 2.16 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.22% | 11.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.00% | -8.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.58% | -3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSS.L and XZSP.DE is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XRSS.L vs. XZSP.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XRSS.L achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly lower than XZSP.DE's 17.72% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRSS.L vs. XZSP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XZSP.DE's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XRSS.L vs. XZSP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XRSS.L vs. XZSP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRSS.L nor XZSP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XRSS.L vs. XZSP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than XZSP.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSS.L and XZSP.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XRSS.L vs. XZSP.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE) at 4.18%. This indicates that XRSS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZSP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.