XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

XRSG.L (Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XRSG.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRSG.L returned 7.77%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for VDPG.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRSG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VDPG.L.

Performance

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XRSG.L is traded in GBp, while VDPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VDPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRSG.L achieves a 19.39% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 35.40% return.

XRSG.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 12.88%
• YTD: 19.39%
• 1Y: 33.68%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: 7.77%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

VDPG.L

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: -10.88%
• 6M: 28.76%
• YTD: 35.40%
• 1Y: 56.81%
• 3Y*: 21.54%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XRSG.L Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C	19.39%	4.65%	11.80%	12.16%	-11.47%	15.43%	15.81%	0.87%
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc	35.40%	30.58%	-3.06%	4.10%	-1.89%	1.95%	15.56%	-19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XRSG.L and VDPG.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019	0.60

The correlation between XRSG.L and VDPG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRSG.L	VDPG.L
Technology	19.1%	39.9%
Industrials	17.9%	10.4%
Healthcare	16.3%	2.6%
Financial Services	15.5%	21.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	5.2%
Real Estate	5.9%	4.2%
Energy	5.3%	1.8%
Basic Materials	4.7%	8.9%
Utilities	2.8%	1.6%
Communication Services	2.5%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	2.1%

Return for Risk

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRSG.L

XRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

VDPG.L

VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRSG.L	VDPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.22	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.70	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	3.81	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.29	12.06	-0.77

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRSG.L and VDPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, which is greater than VDPG.L's maximum drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSG.L and VDPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRSG.L	VDPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.07%	-40.69%	-7.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.61%	-14.83%	+6.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.09%	-26.18%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.09%	-26.18%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.64%	-14.83%	+11.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.79%	-11.19%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	4.70%	-1.72%

Volatility

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) is 4.51%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 13.58%. This indicates that XRSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRSG.L	VDPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	13.58%	-9.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	23.94%	-11.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.04%	25.45%	-8.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.66%	22.09%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.54%	23.70%	-1.16%

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRSG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRSG.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRSG.L nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRSG.L and VDPG.L in my portfolio?

XRSG.L and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRSG.L or VDPG.L?

On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRSG.L or VDPG.L?

VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XRSG.L.

What is the main difference between XRSG.L and VDPG.L?

XRSG.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XRSG.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XRSG.L and 0.15% for VDPG.L.