XRSG.L vs. IITU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L).
XRSG.L and IITU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRSG.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 6, 2015. IITU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both XRSG.L and IITU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSG.L Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C | 2.66% | 4.65% | 11.80% | 12.16% | -11.47% | 15.43% | 15.81% | 20.64% | -7.63% | 4.40% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.60% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRSG.L achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than IITU.L's -7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XRSG.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 10.20%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.28% annualized return.
XRSG.L
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 22.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
IITU.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -7.60%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.71%
- 10Y*
- 23.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRSG.L
IITU.L
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.10 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.62 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.51 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 4.03 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.10 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.86 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 1.09 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.09 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSG.L and IITU.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRSG.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSG.L and IITU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -28.03% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.72% | -16.76% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -28.03% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | -28.03% | -7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -13.74% | +7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -5.17% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 6.26% | -3.21% |
Volatility
XRSG.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 5.29%. This indicates that XRSG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XRSG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 5.29% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.76% | 14.91% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.06% | 23.56% | -3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 21.82% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 21.23% | -0.33% |