VDPG.L vs. FDFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX).
VDPG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. FDFIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 9, 2017.
Performance
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 11.14% | 30.58% | -3.05% | 4.09% | -1.89% | 1.95% | 15.56% | 1.01% |
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund | -2.80% | 9.22% | 27.24% | 19.96% | -8.37% | 29.91% | 14.98% | 1.37% |
Different Trading Currencies
VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while FDFIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FDFIX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than FDFIX's -2.80% return.
VDPG.L
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -11.68%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 20.93%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- —
FDFIX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.80%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX — Risk / Return Rank
VDPG.L
FDFIX
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDPG.L | FDFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.68 | 0.78 | +1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 1.20 | +2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.18 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 1.14 | +2.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.71 | 4.47 | +8.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDPG.L | FDFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 0.78 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.80 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.68 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between VDPG.L and FDFIX is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison
VDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund | 1.17% | 1.11% | 1.26% | 1.48% | 1.70% | 1.27% | 1.52% | 1.78% | 2.16% | 0.50% |
Drawdowns
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than FDFIX's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and FDFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDPG.L | FDFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -33.77% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -12.13% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -24.51% | +6.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.45% | -6.36% | -7.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -4.65% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 2.57% | +1.04% |
Volatility
VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) at 4.51%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VDPG.L | FDFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.64% | 4.51% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 9.53% | +4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 18.81% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 15.96% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 18.55% | -0.66% |