VDPG.L vs. FDFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and FDFIX (Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund) are both funds - VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while FDFIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, VDPG.L returned 13.72%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for FDFIX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDPG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FDFIX.

Performance

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while FDFIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FDFIX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 53.85% return, which is significantly higher than FDFIX's 11.65% return.

VDPG.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 18.83%
• YTD: 53.85%
• 6M: 59.94%
• 1Y: 92.88%
• 3Y*: 26.43%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: —

FDFIX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 6.60%
• YTD: 11.65%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 29.04%
• 3Y*: 19.48%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc	53.85%	30.58%	-3.05%	4.09%	-1.89%	1.95%	15.56%	1.01%
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	11.65%	9.22%	27.24%	19.96%	-8.37%	29.91%	14.98%	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VDPG.L and FDFIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.41

Return for Risk

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPG.L

VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FDFIX

FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VDPG.L	FDFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.56	2.60	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.38	3.36	+2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.48	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.87	3.79	+3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.62	14.01	+11.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.56, which is higher than the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPG.L and FDFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VDPG.L	FDFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.56	2.60	+1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.97	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.76	-0.02

Drawdowns

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than FDFIX's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and FDFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDPG.L	FDFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.11%	-25.84%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-7.99%	-5.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-21.91%	+5.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.64%	-21.91%	+4.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	0.00%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-3.63%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	2.16%	+1.45%

Volatility

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) at 2.75%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDPG.L	FDFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.34%	2.75%	+7.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.86%	8.28%	+9.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	11.66%	+8.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.89%	15.91%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.41%	18.43%	-0.02%

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VDPG.L vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

VDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDFIX Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund	1.03%	1.11%	1.26%	1.48%	1.70%	1.27%	1.52%	1.78%	2.16%	0.50%
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDPG.L and FDFIX in my portfolio?

VDPG.L and FDFIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.