XRSG.L vs. WLDS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L).
XRSG.L and WLDS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRSG.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 6, 2015. WLDS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Small Cap Inde. It was launched on Mar 27, 2018. Both XRSG.L and WLDS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XRSG.L or WLDS.L.
Key characteristics
| XRSG.L | WLDS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.56% | 4.80% |
| 1Y Return | 15.47% | 12.34% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.05% | 3.19% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.16% | 7.23% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.90% | 32.10% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.31% | -33.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.82% | -6.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSG.L and WLDS.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XRSG.L vs. WLDS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XRSG.L achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than WLDS.L's 4.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRSG.L vs. WLDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XRSG.L vs. WLDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XRSG.L vs. WLDS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRSG.L nor WLDS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XRSG.L vs. WLDS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than WLDS.L's maximum drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSG.L and WLDS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XRSG.L vs. WLDS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) at 5.47%. This indicates that XRSG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WLDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.