PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


VDPG.LFWIA.DE
YTD Return-0.44%24.45%
1Y Return5.03%30.00%
Sharpe Ratio0.462.69
Sortino Ratio0.733.68
Omega Ratio1.091.56
Calmar Ratio0.503.86
Martin Ratio1.9318.34
Ulcer Index3.24%1.65%
Daily Std Dev13.64%11.17%
Max Drawdown-30.11%-7.83%
Current Drawdown-5.05%-0.23%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between VDPG.L and FWIA.DE is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than FWIA.DE's 24.45% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.44%
7.88%
VDPG.L
FWIA.DE

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VDPG.L and FWIA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


VDPG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
Expense ratio chart for VDPG.L: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for FWIA.DE: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDPG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VDPG.L, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VDPG.L, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VDPG.L, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VDPG.L, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VDPG.L, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.78
FWIA.DE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FWIA.DE, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FWIA.DE, currently valued at 3.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FWIA.DE, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FWIA.DE, currently valued at 3.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FWIA.DE, currently valued at 15.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.14

VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPG.L and FWIA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50Jun 30Jul 07Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10
0.43
2.29
VDPG.L
FWIA.DE

Dividends

VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDPG.L nor FWIA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than FWIA.DE's maximum drawdown of -7.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and FWIA.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.76%
-1.68%
VDPG.L
FWIA.DE

Volatility

VDPG.L vs. FWIA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) at 3.33%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWIA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.29%
3.33%
VDPG.L
FWIA.DE