XRPR vs. GSG
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. XRPR is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
XRPR vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.79% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 36.99% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -39.79%
- 6M
- -45.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 36.99%
- 6M
- 33.63%
- 1Y
- 45.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
XRPR vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.79% | -41.78% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 36.99% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and GSG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
GSG
XRPR vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPR | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.09 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -89.62% | +24.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.94% | -58.64% | -6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -63.71% | +22.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.66% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.87% | 23.15% | +54.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 22.63% | +55.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 22.04% | +55.83% |
XRPR vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XRPR and GSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
XRPR vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPR nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and GSG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR and GSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
XRPR and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer