XRPR vs. GSG
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. XRPR is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
XRPR vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 27.75% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -47.21%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- 6M
- 24.99%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 1Y
- 29.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
XRPR vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.45% | -41.98% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 27.75% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and GSG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSG
XRPR vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -89.62% | +22.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.87% | -61.43% | -3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.66% | -63.69% | +20.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.45% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.43% | 23.22% | +53.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.43% | 22.74% | +53.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.43% | 21.98% | +54.45% |
XRPR vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XRPR and GSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
XRPR vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPR nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and GSG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR and GSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
XRPR and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer