XRPR vs. EINC
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. XRPR is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
XRPR vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -37.98% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.27% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -15.16%
- YTD
- -37.98%
- 6M
- -40.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
XRPR vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -37.98% | -41.98% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.27% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and EINC is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC
XRPR vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.15% | -87.55% | +22.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.02% | -5.79% | -58.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -44.16% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.25% | 15.07% | +63.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.25% | 19.54% | +58.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.25% | 25.43% | +52.82% |
XRPR vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.56% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and EINC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer