XRPR vs. DCMT
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.
Performance
XRPR vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.79% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 29.86% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -39.79%
- 6M
- -45.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DCMT
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 29.86%
- 6M
- 27.91%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.79% | -41.78% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 29.86% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and DCMT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
DCMT
XRPR vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPR | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 1.08 | -2.08 |
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and DCMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -11.95% | -52.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.94% | -6.78% | -58.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -3.14% | -37.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.87% | 18.46% | +59.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 15.83% | +62.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 15.83% | +62.04% |
XRPR vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.83% | 3.67% | 1.59% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and DCMT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.66% for DCMT.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and DCMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer