XRPR vs. CAOS
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
XRPR vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.79% return, which is significantly lower than CAOS's 0.90% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -39.79%
- 6M
- -45.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAOS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.79% | -41.78% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.90% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and CAOS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
CAOS
XRPR vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPR | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 1.21 | -2.21 |
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -3.60% | -61.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.94% | -0.99% | -63.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -0.90% | -40.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.87% | 1.53% | +76.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 4.25% | +73.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 4.25% | +73.62% |
XRPR vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPR nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and CAOS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
XRPR and CAOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.63% for CAOS.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer