XRPR vs. BSSX
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and BSSX (Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while BSSX is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2033 Index. XRPR is actively managed, while BSSX is passively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSSX.
Performance
XRPR vs. BSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -37.98% return, which is significantly lower than BSSX's 1.04% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -15.16%
- YTD
- -37.98%
- 6M
- -40.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSSX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. BSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -37.98% | -41.98% |
BSSX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.04% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and BSSX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. BSSX — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSSX
XRPR vs. BSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | BSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. BSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, which is greater than BSSX's maximum drawdown of -8.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and BSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | BSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.15% | -8.12% | -57.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.02% | -0.98% | -63.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -3.22% | -38.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. BSSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | BSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.25% | 3.31% | +74.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.25% | 7.77% | +70.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.25% | 7.77% | +70.48% |
XRPR vs. BSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BSSX's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. BSSX - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSSX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.59% | 3.27% | 3.29% | 0.95% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and BSSX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSSX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSSX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
BSSX has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.18% for BSSX.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and BSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer