XRPR vs. BFJL
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the XRP, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.
Performance
XRPR vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than BFJL's -5.11% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -39.04%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BFJL
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- -14.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.56K | $8.09K | $4.95K | |
| $159.08K | $159.59K | $242.33K |
XRPR vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -42.06% | -41.98% |
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -5.11% | -11.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and BFJL is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BFJL
XRPR vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.81 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than BFJL's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and BFJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -21.27% | -46.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.38% | -19.01% | -47.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -12.90% | -32.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.74% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 13.20% | +61.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 13.17% | +61.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 13.17% | +61.27% |
XRPR vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.42% | 1.35% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and BFJL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
XRPR is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. XRPR tracks XRP, while BFJL tracks iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.90% for BFJL.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and BFJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer