BFJL vs. PMAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) and PMAP (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. BFJL is passively managed, while PMAP is actively managed. Over the past year, BFJL returned -14.80% vs 6.59% for PMAP. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BFJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMAP.

Performance

BFJL vs. PMAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly lower than PMAP's 3.86% return.

BFJL

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: -3.14%
• YTD: -5.11%
• 1Y: -14.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.29%

PMAP

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 3.86%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	$12.56K	$8.09K	$4.95K
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	$325.31	$252.49	$2.74K

BFJL vs. PMAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	-5.11%	-7.43%
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	3.86%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJL and PMAP is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

BFJL vs. PMAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFJL

BFJL Risk / Return Rank: 2
BFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PMAP

PMAP Risk / Return Rank: 99
PMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFJL vs. PMAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFJL	PMAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.19	5.59	-6.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.60	10.94	-12.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	2.54	-1.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	18.88	-19.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	88.79	-89.79

BFJL vs. PMAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFJL Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the PMAP Sharpe Ratio of 5.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFJL and PMAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFJL vs. PMAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than PMAP's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and PMAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFJL	PMAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-1.75%	-19.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.27%	-0.35%	-20.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.01%	0.00%	-19.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.90%	-0.08%	-12.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.74%	0.07%	+15.67%

Volatility

BFJL vs. PMAP - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) at 0.35%. This indicates that BFJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFJL	PMAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	0.35%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.54%	0.93%	+4.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.20%	1.18%	+12.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.17%	2.23%	+10.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.17%	2.23%	+10.94%

BFJL vs. PMAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFJL vs. PMAP - Dividend Comparison

BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while PMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	1.42%	1.35%
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFJL and PMAP in my portfolio?

BFJL and PMAP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFJL or PMAP?

BFJL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to PMAP (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFJL dropped -21.27% vs PMAP's -1.75%.

Which ETF is better, BFJL or PMAP?

On 1-year performance, PMAP leads with 6.59% vs -14.80% for BFJL. On fees, PMAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMAP has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFJL or PMAP?

Over the 1-year period, PMAP has performed better with a 6.59% return vs -14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFJL or PMAP?

PMAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFJL or PMAP?

BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for PMAP.

What is the main difference between BFJL and PMAP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.50% for PMAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.59 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.