XRPR vs. BCDF
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XRPR is passively managed, while BCDF is actively managed. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.
Performance
XRPR vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 6.12% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -39.04%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BCDF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.32K | $19.89K | $48.05K | |
| $159.08K | $159.59K | $242.33K |
XRPR vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -42.06% | -41.98% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 6.12% | -0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and BCDF is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCDF
XRPR vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and BCDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -27.70% | -39.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.38% | -5.05% | -61.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -9.76% | -35.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.45% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 15.08% | +59.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 16.87% | +57.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 16.87% | +57.57% |
XRPR vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.38% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and BCDF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.85% for BCDF.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and BCDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer