BCDF vs. NVIR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR).

BCDF and NVIR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCDF is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Aug 1, 2022. NVIR is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Feb 21, 2023.

Performance

BCDF vs. NVIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCDF vs. NVIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	1.72%	11.63%	14.87%	18.20%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	23.20%	9.84%	17.53%	6.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCDF achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than NVIR's 23.20% return.

BCDF

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 13.04%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVIR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 23.20%
• 6M: 25.81%
• 1Y: 33.29%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCDF vs. NVIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCDF and NVIR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

BCDF

Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF

NVIR

Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF

Return for Risk

BCDF vs. NVIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 43
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

NVIR

NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCDF vs. NVIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCDF	NVIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.52	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.96	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.32	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	1.94	-0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	8.38	-4.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCDF vs. NVIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCDF Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the NVIR Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCDF and NVIR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCDF	NVIR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	1.52	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.97	-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between BCDF and NVIR is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BCDF vs. NVIR - Dividend Comparison

BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than NVIR's 0.74% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.48%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	0.74%	0.92%	1.50%	1.34%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BCDF vs. NVIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, which is greater than NVIR's maximum drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and NVIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCDF	NVIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.70%	-22.47%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-17.59%	+8.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.09%	-2.27%	-2.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.23%	-4.62%	-5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	4.08%	-0.64%

Volatility

BCDF vs. NVIR - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) at 4.25%. This indicates that BCDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCDF	NVIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	4.25%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	11.67%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.82%	22.04%	-5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.06%	19.26%	-2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.06%	19.26%	-2.20%