XRPR vs. BAMU
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.
Performance
XRPR vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.79% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.10% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -39.79%
- 6M
- -45.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAMU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.79% | -41.78% |
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.10% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and BAMU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
BAMU
XRPR vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPR | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 4.15 | -5.15 |
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and BAMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -0.36% | -64.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.94% | 0.00% | -64.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -0.02% | -40.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.87% | 0.59% | +77.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 0.87% | +77.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 0.87% | +77.00% |
XRPR vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 3.06% | 3.20% | 3.97% | 0.84% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and BAMU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 1.09% for BAMU.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and BAMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer