BNGO vs. BORR
BNGO (Bionano Genomics, Inc.) and BORR (Borr Drilling Ltd) are both stocks. BNGO operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while BORR operates in Oil & Gas Drilling (Energy). Over the past 5 years, BNGO returned -80.06%/yr vs 22.27%/yr for BORR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNGO vs. BORR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNGO achieves a -15.03% return, which is significantly lower than BORR's 25.56% return.
BNGO
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- -15.03%
- 6M
- -24.86%
- 1Y
- -64.77%
- 3Y*
- -86.03%
- 5Y*
- -80.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BORR
- 1D
- -5.42%
- 1M
- -16.91%
- YTD
- 25.56%
- 6M
- 33.51%
- 1Y
- 164.92%
- 3Y*
- -10.65%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- —
BNGO vs. BORR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNGO Bionano Genomics, Inc. | -15.03% | -91.16% | -84.74% | -87.05% | -51.17% | -2.92% | 148.39% | -76.34% | -25.04% |
BORR Borr Drilling Ltd | 25.56% | 4.15% | -44.49% | 48.09% | 141.26% | 26.50% | -91.00% | -26.12% | -46.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNGO and BORR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
BNGO:
-$6.55
BORR:
$0.12
BNGO:
0.21
BORR:
1.43
BNGO:
$22.06M
BORR:
$1.05B
BNGO:
$3.32M
BORR:
$483.30M
BNGO:
-$23.09M
BORR:
$417.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNGO vs. BORR — Risk / Return Rank
BNGO
BORR
BNGO vs. BORR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bionano Genomics, Inc. (BNGO) and Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNGO | BORR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | 2.68 | -3.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | 3.06 | -4.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.37 | -0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 6.86 | -7.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 18.03 | -19.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNGO | BORR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 2.68 | -3.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.89 | 0.31 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | -0.23 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
BNGO vs. BORR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNGO drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum BORR drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNGO and BORR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNGO | BORR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -99.07% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.85% | -24.21% | -53.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.76% | -80.90% | -18.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.98% | -80.90% | -19.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -90.01% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.70% | -88.83% | +5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.12% | 9.20% | +50.92% |
Volatility
BNGO vs. BORR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bionano Genomics, Inc. (BNGO) is 11.64%, while Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) has a volatility of 18.02%. This indicates that BNGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BORR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNGO | BORR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 18.02% | -6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.02% | 38.72% | +6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.10% | 62.25% | +18.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.54% | 72.13% | +18.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.66% | 118.87% | +72.79% |
Dividends
BNGO vs. BORR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNGO nor BORR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BNGO Bionano Genomics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BORR Borr Drilling Ltd | 0.00% | 0.50% | 7.69% |
Financials
BNGO vs. BORR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bionano Genomics, Inc. and Borr Drilling Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BNGO and BORR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BORR has higher volatility (18.02%) compared to BNGO (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNGO dropped -99.99% vs BORR's -99.07%.
BORR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNGO and BORR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer