XRMI vs. PBP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds - XRMI tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index while PBP tracks the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRMI returned 6.84%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for PBP. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

XRMI vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's 6.88% return.

XRMI

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: 2.46%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 1Y: 9.55%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.29%
• 6M: 6.25%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 1Y: 17.28%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: 7.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRMI vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	3.15%	4.60%	15.18%	4.22%	-14.06%	2.26%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	6.88%	8.49%	19.83%	11.59%	-11.82%	5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and PBP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.72

The correlation between XRMI and PBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRMI vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRMI	PBP
Technology	37.7%	39.0%
Financial Services	12.1%	11.1%
Communication Services	9.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.9%
Healthcare	9.3%	8.3%
Industrials	7.9%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.5%
Energy	3.0%	3.1%
Utilities	2.7%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

XRMI vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 61
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 56

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 89
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRMI vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRMI	PBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.40	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	3.48	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.51	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	3.32	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	17.12	-9.43

XRMI vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRMI	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-43.43%	+28.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.02%	-5.22%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.34%	-15.42%	+7.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.22%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-6.66%	+0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	1.01%	+0.23%

Volatility

XRMI vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 1.41%, while Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRMI	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	2.07%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.41%	6.04%	-1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.57%	7.24%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	11.88%	-5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.88%	13.66%	-6.78%

XRMI vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRMI vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.54%, more than PBP's 11.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.09%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.54%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRMI and PBP in my portfolio?

XRMI and PBP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRMI or PBP?

PBP has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to XRMI (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs PBP's -43.43%.

Which ETF is better, XRMI or PBP?

On 3-year performance, PBP leads with 11.79% vs 6.84% for XRMI. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRMI or PBP?

Over the 3-year period, PBP has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRMI or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XRMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRMI or PBP?

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.54%, compared with 11.09% for PBP.

What is the main difference between XRMI and PBP?

XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.29% for PBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.