PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRMI vs. CRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XRMI vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XRMI vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.13%4.60%10.97%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
18.37%-13.40%-51.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 18.37% return.


XRMI

1D
0.41%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
-2.13%
6M
1.59%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
10Y*

CRSH

1D
-1.76%
1M
6.01%
YTD
18.37%
6M
24.09%
1Y
-24.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XRMI vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XRMI vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRMI vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRMICRSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

-0.57

+1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

-0.59

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.93

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

-0.55

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.72

-0.75

+3.47

XRMI vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and CRSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRMICRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

-0.57

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.64

+0.90

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and CRSH is -0.44. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

XRMI vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, less than CRSH's 100.61% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.78%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
100.61%138.78%94.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and CRSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XRMICRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-63.68%

+48.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-48.16%

+43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-53.43%

+49.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-41.91%

+35.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

35.23%

-33.76%

Volatility

XRMI vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 2.68%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XRMICRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

8.04%

-5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

23.47%

-18.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.88%

42.40%

-35.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

48.37%

-41.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

48.37%

-41.38%