XRMI vs. BOTZ
XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRMI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRMI returned 6.71%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 11.15% return.
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 29.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.75% | 4.60% | 15.18% | 4.22% | -14.06% | 2.68% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 11.15% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRMI and BOTZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XRMI and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRMI
BOTZ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
XRMI
BOTZ
Financial Services
XRMI
BOTZ
Communication Services
XRMI
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
XRMI
BOTZ
Healthcare
XRMI
BOTZ
Industrials
XRMI
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
XRMI
BOTZ
Energy
XRMI
BOTZ
Utilities
XRMI
BOTZ
Real Estate
XRMI
BOTZ
-
Basic Materials
XRMI
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRMI vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
XRMI
BOTZ
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRMI | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.53 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | 5.26 | +2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRMI | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.24 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.44 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRMI | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -55.54% | +40.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | -19.34% | +14.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.34% | -29.02% | +20.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -3.27% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -18.32% | +12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 5.63% | -4.40% |
Volatility
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 0.89%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRMI | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 7.77% | -6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 18.40% | -14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 23.98% | -18.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 26.73% | -19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 25.73% | -18.82% |
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRMI vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.62% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRMI and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to XRMI (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 3-year performance, BOTZ leads with 12.97% vs 6.71% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.
XRMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BOTZ is Robotics. XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.68% for BOTZ.
XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRMI and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer