XRMI vs. BNO
XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XRMI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRMI returned 6.71%/yr vs 27.93%/yr for BNO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
XRMI vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
XRMI vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.75% | 4.60% | 15.18% | 4.22% | -14.06% | 2.68% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRMI and BNO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between XRMI and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRMI vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
XRMI
BNO
XRMI vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRMI | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 5.17 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | 9.76 | -2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRMI | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.23 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.14 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XRMI vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRMI | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -87.06% | +71.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | -17.87% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.34% | -23.75% | +15.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -10.29% | +10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -40.17% | +34.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 9.45% | -8.22% |
Volatility
XRMI vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 0.89%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRMI | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 14.22% | -13.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 36.10% | -31.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 41.46% | -36.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 35.38% | -28.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 36.68% | -29.77% |
XRMI vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRMI vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.62% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRMI and BNO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to XRMI (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 27.93% vs 6.71% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 27.93% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
XRMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.90% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRMI and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer