XRLX vs. GDT
XRLX (FundX Conservative ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRLX charges 1.63%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
XRLX vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRLX
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRLX vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF | 5.62% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRLX and GDT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRLX vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
XRLX
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XRLX vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRLX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRLX vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRLX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRLX and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRLX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -22.61% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -22.49% | +20.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -11.03% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | — | — |
Volatility
XRLX vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRLX | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.85% | 32.99% | -24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 32.99% | -21.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 32.99% | -21.82% |
XRLX vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRLX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRLX vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
XRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than GDT's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF | 2.62% | 2.77% | 1.66% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRLX and GDT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.63% for XRLX.
XRLX has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.91% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: FundX and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.63% for XRLX and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for XRLX and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer