PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. RSPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPT

1D
-0.76%
1M
22.88%
YTD
47.30%
6M
46.37%
1Y
75.62%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
47.30%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and RSPT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.60

The correlation between XRLV and RSPT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRLV vs. RSPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
RSPT

Utilities

21.5%

-

Financial Services

16.3%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%

-

Real Estate

11.6%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.2%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%

-

Technology

5.6%
97.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Communication Services

2.8%

-

Energy

1.1%
1.4%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
RSPT

-

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
RSPT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
RSPT

-

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
RSPT

-

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
RSPT

-

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
RSPT
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
RSPT

-

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
RSPT
97.6%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
RSPT

-

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
RSPT

-

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
RSPT
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. RSPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVRSPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVRSPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

Volatility

XRLV vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVRSPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

XRLV vs. RSPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPT's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRLV vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than RSPT's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.25%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and RSPT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.25% for RSPT.

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPT is Technology Equities. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.40% for RSPT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and RSPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer