PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIBL

1D
-0.46%
1M
31.17%
YTD
95.37%
6M
95.99%
1Y
276.75%
3Y*
62.38%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%3.78%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
95.37%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and HIBL is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between XRLV and HIBL has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XRLV vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
HIBL

Utilities

21.5%
3.2%

Financial Services

16.3%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
0.6%

Real Estate

11.6%

-

Healthcare

8.4%
2.9%

Industrials

7.2%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
12.9%

Technology

5.6%
45.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.7%

Energy

1.1%
2.2%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
HIBL
3.2%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
HIBL
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
HIBL
0.6%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
HIBL

-

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
HIBL
2.9%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
HIBL
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
HIBL
12.9%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
HIBL
45.8%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
HIBL
4.6%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
HIBL
3.7%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
HIBL
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

Volatility

XRLV vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.87%

XRLV vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRLV vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and HIBL have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.18% for HIBL.

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 1.12% for HIBL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer