XRLV vs. FTEC
XRLV (Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
XRLV vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRLV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
XRLV vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 6.34% | 4.11% | 14.11% | 0.06% | -4.77% | 27.39% | 2.56% | 29.80% | -3.28% | 23.51% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 31.89% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRLV and FTEC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XRLV and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XRLV vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRLV
FTEC
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
XRLV
FTEC
-
Financial Services
XRLV
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
XRLV
FTEC
-
Real Estate
XRLV
FTEC
-
Healthcare
XRLV
FTEC
-
Industrials
XRLV
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
XRLV
FTEC
Technology
XRLV
FTEC
Basic Materials
XRLV
FTEC
-
Communication Services
XRLV
FTEC
Energy
XRLV
FTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRLV vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
XRLV
FTEC
XRLV vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRLV | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.99 | — |
Drawdowns
XRLV vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRLV | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.49% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.56% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility
XRLV vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRLV | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 20.63% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.23% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.69% | — |
XRLV vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XRLV vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 1.53% | 2.15% | 1.94% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.26% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRLV and FTEC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.
XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.
XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while FTEC is Technology Equities. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.08% for FTEC.
Find the right allocation for XRLV and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer