PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTEC

1D
-1.49%
1M
18.21%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.74%
1Y
60.87%
3Y*
33.93%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
25.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
31.89%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and FTEC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.54

The correlation between XRLV and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRLV vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
FTEC

Utilities

21.5%

-

Financial Services

16.3%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%

-

Real Estate

11.6%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.2%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
0.0%

Technology

5.6%
98.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Communication Services

2.8%
0.0%

Energy

1.1%
0.4%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
FTEC

-

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
FTEC
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
FTEC

-

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
FTEC

-

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
FTEC

-

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
FTEC
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
FTEC
0.0%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
FTEC
98.0%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
FTEC

-

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
FTEC
0.0%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
FTEC
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVFTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

Volatility

XRLV vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

XRLV vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.32%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and FTEC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while FTEC is Technology Equities. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.08% for FTEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer