XRLV vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XRLV (Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. XRLV is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

XRLV vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XRLV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 27.78%
• YTD: 74.30%
• 6M: 73.13%
• 1Y: 144.01%
• 3Y*: 55.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF	6.34%	4.11%	14.11%	1.94%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	74.30%	49.85%	30.98%	19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and CHAT is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023	0.02

The correlation between XRLV and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRLV vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRLV	CHAT
Utilities	21.5%	-
Financial Services	16.3%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	15.3%	-
Real Estate	11.6%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	7.2%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	5.6%
Technology	5.6%	76.5%
Basic Materials	3.1%	-
Communication Services	2.8%	16.6%
Energy	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

XRLV vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRLV	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.98	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XRLV	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.34%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.66%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.35%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRLV	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.74%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	29.90%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.90%	—

XRLV vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRLV vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than CHAT's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.64%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF	1.53%	2.15%	1.94%	2.57%	1.96%	1.26%	1.65%	1.66%	1.76%	1.39%	1.71%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRLV and CHAT in my portfolio?

XRLV and CHAT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRLV or CHAT?

On fees, XRLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRLV or CHAT?

XRLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRLV or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.53% for XRLV.

What is the main difference between XRLV and CHAT?

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while CHAT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.75% for CHAT.