XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and XSLR.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while XSLR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRH0.L returned -15.19%/yr vs 17.61%/yr for XSLR.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSLR.DE.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRH0.L is traded in USD, while XSLR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSLR.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly lower than XSLR.DE's -22.52% return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -28.17%
- 6M
- -23.84%
- 1Y
- 40.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- -15.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.32%
XSLR.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -22.06%
- YTD
- -22.52%
- 6M
- -22.52%
- 1Y
- 63.55%
- 3Y*
- 37.24%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- —
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -28.17% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 113.35% |
XSLR.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities | -22.52% | 159.51% | 23.42% | -1.22% | 4.64% | -13.49% | 59.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and XSLR.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020 | 0.10 |
The correlation between XRH0.L and XSLR.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
XSLR.DE
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRH0.L | XSLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.31 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 2.90 | -0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than XSLR.DE's maximum drawdown of -48.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and XSLR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | XSLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -48.91% | -36.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.30% | -48.91% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -48.91% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.27% | -48.91% | -32.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.56% | -48.19% | -19.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -15.32% | -35.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.21% | 21.98% | -0.77% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) at 14.69%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | XSLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.09% | 14.69% | +13.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.45% | 54.39% | +16.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.78% | 61.32% | +28.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.02% | 36.66% | +32.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.84% | 36.70% | +30.14% |
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XSLR.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. XSLR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor XSLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and XSLR.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSLR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while XSLR.DE is Silver. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.20% for XSLR.DE.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and XSLR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer