PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
0.37%129.87%30.90%-4.25%10.74%-6.08%32.02%
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
9.98%48.99%34.24%9.40%7.00%3.88%-1.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLR.DE achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than GLDA.DE's 9.98% return.


XSLR.DE

1D
1.85%
1M
-12.73%
YTD
0.37%
6M
61.24%
1Y
107.55%
3Y*
43.02%
5Y*
25.09%
10Y*

GLDA.DE

1D
2.80%
1M
-9.01%
YTD
9.98%
6M
24.93%
1Y
42.11%
3Y*
31.11%
5Y*
22.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLR.DE
XSLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDA.DE
GLDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLR.DEGLDA.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.76

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

2.25

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.59

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

9.82

-1.13

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLR.DE and GLDA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLR.DEGLDA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.76

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.42

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.21

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between XSLR.DE and GLDA.DE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSLR.DE nor GLDA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, which is greater than GLDA.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.DE and GLDA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLR.DEGLDA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.56%

-18.34%

-20.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.56%

-16.53%

-22.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.56%

-16.53%

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.71%

-9.01%

-22.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-5.59%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.42%

4.36%

+8.06%

Volatility

XSLR.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.42% compared to Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) at 11.22%. This indicates that XSLR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSLR.DEGLDA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.42%

11.22%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.10%

21.07%

+29.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.96%

23.78%

+28.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.28%

15.82%

+16.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.53%

15.80%

+16.73%