XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 29.93%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.

Performance

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XRH0.L is traded in USD, while XCX5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XCX5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than XCX5.L's -12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 29.93%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.66% annualized return.

XRH0.L

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -3.00%
• YTD: -15.28%
• 6M: 10.23%
• 1Y: 73.21%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: -13.58%
• 10Y*: 29.93%

XCX5.L

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -2.56%
• YTD: -12.92%
• 6M: -12.12%
• 1Y: -12.91%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: 3.04%
• 10Y*: 6.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	-15.28%	205.23%	-14.69%	-60.81%	-4.46%	-15.51%	183.21%	132.83%	46.39%	100.00%
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C	-12.92%	2.00%	10.06%	18.50%	-8.61%	25.05%	12.84%	6.69%	-9.02%	36.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and XCX5.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011	0.07

Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L

XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

XCX5.L

XCX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
XCX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
XCX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
XCX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
XCX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XRH0.L	XCX5.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	-0.78	+1.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	-1.04	+2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.88	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	-0.60	+2.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	-1.43	+5.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and XCX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRH0.L	XCX5.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	-0.78	+1.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.18	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.32	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.16	+0.03

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than XCX5.L's maximum drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and XCX5.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRH0.L	XCX5.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.90%	-45.61%	-40.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.33%	-21.35%	-12.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.87%	-27.32%	-19.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.47%	-27.32%	-55.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.90%	-45.61%	-40.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.74%	-22.59%	-39.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.31%	-12.45%	-38.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.81%	9.01%	+8.80%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) at 6.57%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRH0.L	XCX5.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.10%	6.57%	+5.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.72%	14.12%	+38.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.00%	16.59%	+54.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.08%	17.21%	+46.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.25%	20.66%	+43.59%

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRH0.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRH0.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRH0.L and XCX5.L in my portfolio?

XRH0.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRH0.L or XCX5.L?

On fees, XCX5.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRH0.L or XCX5.L?

XCX5.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.

What is the main difference between XRH0.L and XCX5.L?

XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.