XCX5.L vs. XMMS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L).
XCX5.L and XMMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCX5.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2010. XMMS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 21, 2017. Both XCX5.L and XMMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XCX5.L or XMMS.L.
Key characteristics
| XCX5.L | XMMS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.52% | 4.88% |
| 1Y Return | 27.20% | 6.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.45% | -1.37% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.90% | 2.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.79 | 0.55 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.28% | 12.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.74% | -27.76% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.74% | -14.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCX5.L and XMMS.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XCX5.L vs. XMMS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XCX5.L achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than XMMS.L's 4.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCX5.L vs. XMMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX5.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMS.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XCX5.L vs. XMMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XCX5.L vs. XMMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCX5.L nor XMMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XCX5.L vs. XMMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX5.L drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, which is greater than XMMS.L's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX5.L and XMMS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XCX5.L vs. XMMS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) is 2.71%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that XCX5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.