XRH0.L vs. WSTCX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and WSTCX (Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund) are both funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while WSTCX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Ivy Funds. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 27.39%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for WSTCX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for WSTCX.

Performance

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -30.13% return, which is significantly lower than WSTCX's 37.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XRH0.L having a 27.39% annualized return and WSTCX not far ahead at 28.09%.

XRH0.L

• 1D: -11.11%
• 1M: -18.16%
• YTD: -30.13%
• 6M: -14.67%
• 1Y: 42.86%
• 3Y*: 15.68%
• 5Y*: -15.32%
• 10Y*: 27.39%

WSTCX

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 2.72%
• YTD: 37.81%
• 6M: 36.03%
• 1Y: 61.64%
• 3Y*: 65.86%
• 5Y*: 30.60%
• 10Y*: 28.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	-30.13%	205.23%	-14.69%	-60.81%	-4.46%	-15.51%	183.21%	132.83%	46.39%	100.00%
WSTCX Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund	37.81%	32.86%	117.81%	39.18%	-33.22%	12.80%	35.09%	49.22%	-5.97%	31.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and WSTCX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011	0.05

Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L

XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

WSTCX

WSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 80
WSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
WSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
WSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRH0.L	WSTCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	2.36	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.86	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.40	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	3.73	-2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.06	13.19	-11.13

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the WSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and WSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than WSTCX's maximum drawdown of -60.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and WSTCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRH0.L	WSTCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.90%	-60.92%	-24.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.30%	-16.84%	-23.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.87%	-44.66%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.27%	-60.92%	-20.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.90%	-60.92%	-24.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.45%	-5.20%	-63.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.58%	-18.36%	-32.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.77%	4.75%	+16.02%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 29.41% compared to Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX) at 13.54%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRH0.L	WSTCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.41%	13.54%	+15.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.93%	22.10%	+48.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.80%	26.74%	+63.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.02%	74.68%	-5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.83%	55.14%	+11.69%

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WSTCX's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRH0.L vs. WSTCX - Dividend Comparison

XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WSTCX Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund	9.69%	13.35%	81.76%	21.98%	57.60%	61.50%	11.27%	13.85%	16.72%	7.61%	0.00%	2.85%
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRH0.L and WSTCX in my portfolio?

XRH0.L and WSTCX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.