WSTCX vs. XLK
WSTCX (Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WSTCX returned 28.73%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WSTCX charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
WSTCX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSTCX achieves a 44.87% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, WSTCX has outperformed XLK with an annualized return of 28.73%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively lower 25.48% annualized return.
WSTCX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 44.87%
- 6M
- 43.48%
- 1Y
- 75.55%
- 3Y*
- 68.65%
- 5Y*
- 32.23%
- 10Y*
- 28.73%
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
WSTCX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSTCX Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund | 44.87% | 32.86% | 117.81% | 39.18% | -33.22% | 12.80% | 35.09% | 49.22% | -5.97% | 31.79% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSTCX and XLK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.86 |
The correlation between WSTCX and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSTCX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
WSTCX
XLK
WSTCX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSTCX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.38 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.66 | 3.31 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 10.56 | +5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSTCX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSTCX drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSTCX and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSTCX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.92% | -82.05% | +21.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -15.92% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.66% | -25.66% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.92% | -33.56% | -27.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.92% | -33.56% | -27.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -6.96% | +6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.37% | -34.90% | +16.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 4.98% | -0.26% |
Volatility
WSTCX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) have volatilities of 12.37% and 12.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSTCX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.37% | 12.51% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.69% | 19.70% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.31% | 23.48% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.64% | 25.37% | +49.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.16% | 24.71% | +30.45% |
WSTCX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSTCX has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSTCX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
WSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSTCX Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund | 9.22% | 13.35% | 81.76% | 21.98% | 57.60% | 61.50% | 11.27% | 13.85% | 16.72% | 7.61% | 0.00% | 2.85% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, WSTCX and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to WSTCX (12.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSTCX dropped -60.92% vs XLK's -82.05%.
WSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSTCX and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer