XRH0.L vs. REMX.L
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and REMX.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc)) are both Metals funds - XRH0.L tracks the Rhodium while REMX.L tracks the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRH0.L returned 22.13%/yr vs -5.20%/yr for REMX.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.L.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -33.19% return, which is significantly lower than REMX.L's -2.56% return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -14.29%
- 6M
- -34.62%
- YTD
- -33.19%
- 1Y
- 29.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- -16.30%
- 10Y*
- 27.11%
REMX.L
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -26.89%
- 6M
- -19.33%
- YTD
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 49.63%
- 3Y*
- -5.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -33.19% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -9.44% |
REMX.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) | -2.56% | 88.79% | -35.65% | -18.38% | -30.93% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and REMX.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
REMX.L
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) (REMX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRH0.L | REMX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.42 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 4.46 | -3.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than REMX.L's maximum drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and REMX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | REMX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -73.21% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.03% | -34.86% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -60.13% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.83% | -41.93% | -27.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.65% | -41.58% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.19% | 11.09% | +12.10% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 22.02% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) (REMX.L) at 11.57%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | REMX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.02% | 11.57% | +10.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.17% | 34.30% | +33.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.03% | 47.11% | +42.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.07% | 54.72% | +14.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.85% | 54.72% | +12.13% |
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. REMX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor REMX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and REMX.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMX.L is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMX.L is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while REMX.L tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.59% for REMX.L.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and REMX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer