REMX.L vs. CMFP.L
REMX.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF) and CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - REMX.L tracks the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF while CMFP.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REMX.L returned -3.25%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for CMFP.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REMX.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CMFP.L.
Performance
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
REMX.L is traded in USD, while CMFP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMFP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX.L achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than CMFP.L's 15.64% return.
REMX.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -23.14%
- 6M
- -17.06%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 60.74%
- 3Y*
- -3.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMFP.L
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 24.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF | 2.13% | 88.79% | -35.65% | -18.38% | -30.93% | 7.28% |
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 15.64% | 16.67% | 5.08% | -6.76% | 18.60% | 4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX.L and CMFP.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.26 |
The correlation between REMX.L and CMFP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L — Risk / Return Rank
REMX.L
CMFP.L
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMX.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.05 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 6.65 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX.L drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, roughly equal to the maximum CMFP.L drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX.L and CMFP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -72.10% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.73% | -12.01% | -19.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.69% | -23.04% | -37.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.14% | -20.65% | -18.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -49.74% | +8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.86% | 3.71% | +7.15% |
Volatility
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) at 4.03%. This indicates that REMX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMFP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 4.03% | +7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.16% | 12.22% | +21.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.91% | 14.41% | +32.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.71% | 20.36% | +34.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.71% | 16.60% | +38.11% |
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CMFP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX.L vs. CMFP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither REMX.L nor CMFP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX.L and CMFP.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMFP.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMFP.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.L.
REMX.L tracks VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF, while CMFP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX.L and 0.30% for CMFP.L.
Find the right allocation for REMX.L and CMFP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer