XRH0.L vs. META.L
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and META.L (WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced) are both Metals funds - XRH0.L tracks the Rhodium while META.L tracks the Optimised Roll Industrial Metals. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRH0.L returned 18.90%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for META.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for META.L.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. META.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than META.L's 10.73% return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -15.28%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 73.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- -13.58%
- 10Y*
- 29.93%
META.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRH0.L vs. META.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -15.28% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -2.73% |
META.L WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced | 10.73% | 16.98% | 3.79% | -8.15% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and META.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. META.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
META.L
XRH0.L vs. META.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRH0.L | META.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.42 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 12.10 | -8.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRH0.L | META.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.02 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.56 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. META.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than META.L's maximum drawdown of -20.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and META.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | META.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -20.21% | -65.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.33% | -9.01% | -25.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -20.21% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.74% | -1.41% | -60.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.31% | -9.94% | -41.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.81% | 2.55% | +15.26% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. META.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) at 4.42%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | META.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.10% | 4.42% | +7.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.72% | 12.91% | +39.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.00% | 15.22% | +55.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.08% | 17.54% | +46.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.25% | 17.54% | +46.71% |
XRH0.L vs. META.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than META.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. META.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor META.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and META.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, META.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
META.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while META.L tracks Optimised Roll Industrial Metals. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.40% for META.L.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and META.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer