PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
META.L vs. ALUM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

META.L vs. ALUM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) and WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

META.L vs. ALUM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
META.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced
1.15%16.98%3.79%-8.15%16.29%
ALUM.L
WisdomTree Aluminium
18.16%17.98%4.62%-4.48%2.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META.L achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than ALUM.L's 18.16% return.


META.L

1D
0.52%
1M
-4.30%
YTD
1.15%
6M
13.56%
1Y
15.95%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*

ALUM.L

1D
2.04%
1M
12.01%
YTD
18.16%
6M
31.23%
1Y
39.45%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


META.L vs. ALUM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

META.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ALUM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

META.L vs. ALUM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META.L
META.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
META.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
META.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
META.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
META.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ALUM.L
ALUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META.L vs. ALUM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) and WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


META.LALUM.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

2.18

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

3.04

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

4.63

-2.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.65

14.72

-9.07

META.L vs. ALUM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META.L and ALUM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


META.LALUM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.18

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.13

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between META.L and ALUM.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

META.L vs. ALUM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither META.L nor ALUM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

META.L vs. ALUM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META.L drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, smaller than the maximum ALUM.L drawdown of -77.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META.L and ALUM.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


META.LALUM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-77.63%

+57.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-8.86%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-52.38%

+46.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-58.67%

+48.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.78%

+0.15%

Volatility

META.L vs. ALUM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) is 5.42%, while WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that META.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALUM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


META.LALUM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

9.76%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

14.47%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

17.99%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

22.75%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

19.95%

-2.24%