XRH0.L vs. IVVD

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) is Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while IVVD (Invivyd Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, XRH0.L returned 18.05%/yr vs -5.99%/yr for IVVD. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XRH0.L vs. IVVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Invivyd Inc. (IVVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly higher than IVVD's -64.68% return.

XRH0.L

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: -28.17%
• 6M: -23.84%
• 1Y: 40.60%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: -15.19%
• 10Y*: 27.32%

IVVD

• 1D: -7.56%
• 1M: -23.47%
• YTD: -64.68%
• 6M: -64.10%
• 1Y: 22.01%
• 3Y*: -5.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. IVVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	-28.17%	205.23%	-14.69%	-60.81%	-4.46%	-26.62%
IVVD Invivyd Inc.	-64.68%	457.44%	-88.75%	162.67%	-79.34%	-65.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and IVVD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021	0.00

Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. IVVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L

XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

IVVD

IVVD Risk / Return Rank: 57
IVVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IVVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
IVVD Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IVVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
IVVD Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. IVVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Invivyd Inc. (IVVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRH0.L	IVVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.16	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	1.48	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.17	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	0.30	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.91	0.62	+1.29

XRH0.L vs. IVVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the IVVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and IVVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. IVVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, smaller than the maximum IVVD drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and IVVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRH0.L	IVVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.90%	-99.36%	+13.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.30%	-73.26%	+32.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.87%	-92.90%	+46.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.56%	-98.44%	+30.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.59%	-91.16%	+40.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.21%	35.78%	-14.57%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. IVVD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Invivyd Inc. (IVVD) have volatilities of 28.09% and 27.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRH0.L	IVVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.09%	27.52%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.45%	66.18%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.78%	140.17%	-50.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.02%	178.09%	-109.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.84%	178.09%	-111.25%

Dividends

XRH0.L vs. IVVD - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRH0.L nor IVVD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRH0.L and IVVD in my portfolio?

XRH0.L and IVVD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.