PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVD vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVD vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invivyd Inc. (IVVD) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVD achieves a -62.16% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 3.52% return.


IVVD

1D
2.21%
1M
-15.04%
YTD
-62.16%
6M
-66.62%
1Y
33.29%
3Y*
-4.41%
5Y*
10Y*

VUG

1D
-2.12%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
3.52%
6M
2.23%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
18.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVD vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IVVD
Invivyd Inc.
-62.16%457.44%-88.75%162.67%-79.34%-65.43%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
3.52%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVD and VUG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVD vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVD
IVVD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IVVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVD vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invivyd Inc. (IVVD) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVVDVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.22

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

4.15

-3.18

IVVD vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVD Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVD and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVVD vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVD drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVD and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVDVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-50.68%

-48.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.26%

-16.53%

-56.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.90%

-22.85%

-70.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.33%

-6.88%

-91.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.13%

-7.09%

-84.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.53%

4.84%

+29.69%

Volatility

IVVD vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Invivyd Inc. (IVVD) has a higher volatility of 25.46% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 6.86%. This indicates that IVVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVDVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.46%

6.86%

+18.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.43%

13.44%

+55.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.07%

16.91%

+124.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

178.37%

22.39%

+155.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

178.37%

21.51%

+156.86%

Dividends

IVVD vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

IVVD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVVD
Invivyd Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVVD and VUG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVVD has higher volatility (25.46%) compared to VUG (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVD dropped -99.36% vs VUG's -50.68%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVD and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer