XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and EXUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while EXUS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XRH0.L returned 73.21% vs 22.21% for EXUS.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EXUS.L.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.L's 8.97% return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -15.28%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 73.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- -13.58%
- 10Y*
- 29.93%
EXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -15.28% | 205.23% | -2.18% |
EXUS.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 8.97% | 31.98% | 1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and EXUS.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
EXUS.L
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRH0.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.05 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 7.56 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRH0.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.51 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 1.19 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than EXUS.L's maximum drawdown of -12.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and EXUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -12.85% | -73.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.33% | -10.74% | -23.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.74% | -0.59% | -61.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.31% | -2.35% | -48.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.81% | 2.93% | +14.88% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.10% | 4.25% | +7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.72% | 12.23% | +40.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.00% | 14.64% | +56.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.08% | 15.29% | +48.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.25% | 15.29% | +48.96% |
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EXUS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. EXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor EXUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and EXUS.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while EXUS.L is Global Equities. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while EXUS.L tracks MSCI World ex USA index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.15% for EXUS.L.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and EXUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer