Correlation
The correlation between EXUS.L and EIMI.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L).
EXUS.L and EIMI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EXUS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World ex USA index. It was launched on Mar 6, 2024. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both EXUS.L and EIMI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EXUS.L or EIMI.L.
Performance
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
EXUS.L:
0.86
EIMI.L:
0.53
EXUS.L:
1.17
EIMI.L:
0.98
EXUS.L:
1.16
EIMI.L:
1.13
EXUS.L:
1.02
EIMI.L:
0.50
EXUS.L:
3.09
EIMI.L:
1.93
EXUS.L:
4.24%
EIMI.L:
5.92%
EXUS.L:
16.64%
EIMI.L:
18.10%
EXUS.L:
-12.85%
EIMI.L:
-38.73%
EXUS.L:
-0.74%
EIMI.L:
-8.56%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXUS.L achieves a 16.19% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 7.70% return.
EXUS.L
16.19%
4.26%
13.03%
14.30%
N/A
N/A
N/A
EIMI.L
7.70%
4.11%
6.27%
11.42%
5.53%
8.04%
4.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EXUS.L
EIMI.L
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EXUS.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -12.85%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS.L and EIMI.L.
Loading data...
Volatility
EXUS.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) is 2.86%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that EXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...