PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XRH0.L is traded in USD, while ABX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ABX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than ABX.TO's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed ABX.TO with an annualized return of 29.93%, while ABX.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.


XRH0.L

1D
0.78%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-15.28%
6M
10.23%
1Y
73.21%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
-13.58%
10Y*
29.93%

ABX.TO

1D
2.04%
1M
10.81%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
5.84%
1Y
116.85%
3Y*
38.65%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
-15.28%205.23%-14.69%-60.81%-4.46%-15.51%183.21%132.83%46.39%100.00%
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
-0.60%187.03%-12.22%8.07%-6.58%-13.26%24.23%38.87%-5.09%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and ABX.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L
XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ABX.TO
ABX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRH0.LABX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

4.01

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

10.21

-6.11

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and ABX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRH0.LABX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.63

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.44

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.29

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.09

+0.11

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ABX.TO drawdown of -88.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and ABX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRH0.LABX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.90%

-88.48%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.33%

-29.34%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.87%

-29.34%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.47%

-47.72%

-34.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.90%

-57.12%

-28.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.74%

-18.29%

-43.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.31%

-51.35%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.81%

11.49%

+6.32%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) is 12.10%, while Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) has a volatility of 16.75%. This indicates that XRH0.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRH0.LABX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

16.75%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.72%

34.26%

+18.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.00%

44.67%

+26.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.08%

36.32%

+27.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.25%

37.38%

+26.87%

Dividends

XRH0.L vs. ABX.TO - Dividend Comparison

XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.13%1.23%2.45%2.27%3.64%4.06%1.42%0.92%1.36%1.02%0.59%1.93%
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRH0.L and ABX.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and ABX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer