PortfoliosLab logo
ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ABX.TO and PHYS.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABX.TO:

0.55

PHYS.TO:

2.64

Sortino Ratio

ABX.TO:

1.05

PHYS.TO:

3.48

Omega Ratio

ABX.TO:

1.13

PHYS.TO:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

ABX.TO:

0.39

PHYS.TO:

5.33

Martin Ratio

ABX.TO:

1.76

PHYS.TO:

16.36

Ulcer Index

ABX.TO:

11.26%

PHYS.TO:

2.71%

Daily Std Dev

ABX.TO:

33.31%

PHYS.TO:

16.17%

Max Drawdown

ABX.TO:

-84.51%

PHYS.TO:

-27.08%

Current Drawdown

ABX.TO:

-38.36%

PHYS.TO:

-2.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABX.TO:

CA$46.58B

PHYS.TO:

CA$30.62B

EPS

ABX.TO:

CA$1.82

PHYS.TO:

CA$5.91

PE Ratio

ABX.TO:

14.88

PHYS.TO:

5.99

PS Ratio

ABX.TO:

3.50

PHYS.TO:

6.15

PB Ratio

ABX.TO:

1.34

PHYS.TO:

1.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$13.31B

PHYS.TO:

CA$1.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$5.50B

PHYS.TO:

CA$1.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$3.19B

PHYS.TO:

CA$289.88M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ABX.TO having a 22.01% return and PHYS.TO slightly higher at 22.26%.


ABX.TO

YTD

22.01%

1M

0.74%

6M

6.58%

1Y

18.95%

5Y*

-3.82%

10Y*

7.20%

PHYS.TO

YTD

22.26%

1M

4.27%

6M

22.81%

1Y

41.21%

5Y*

13.05%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABX.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABX.TO is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABX.TO is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABX.TO is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABX.TO is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABX.TO is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABX.TO is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYS.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYS.TO is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYS.TO is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABX.TO and PHYS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Dividend Comparison

ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while PHYS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
1.48%1.79%1.67%2.80%3.24%1.07%0.81%1.22%1.02%0.59%1.69%2.16%
PHYS.TO
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABX.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, which is greater than PHYS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABX.TO and PHYS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) at 7.72%. This indicates that ABX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ABX.TO vs. PHYS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Gold Corporation and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
3.13B
-42.32M
(ABX.TO) Total Revenue
(PHYS.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items