XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and 0GZB.DE (BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC) are both Metals funds - XRH0.L tracks the Rhodium while 0GZB.DE tracks the RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRH0.L returned -13.58%/yr vs 5.78%/yr for 0GZB.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for 0GZB.DE.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRH0.L is traded in USD, while 0GZB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0GZB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than 0GZB.DE's 9.48% return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -15.28%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 73.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- -13.58%
- 10Y*
- 29.93%
0GZB.DE
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 22.07%
- 1Y
- 44.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- —
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -15.28% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 52.89% |
0GZB.DE BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC | 9.48% | 50.68% | 2.19% | 7.00% | -16.45% | 10.71% | 33.47% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and 0GZB.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2019 | 0.09 |
The correlation between XRH0.L and 0GZB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
0GZB.DE
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRH0.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.04 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 9.48 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRH0.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.02 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.24 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.57 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than 0GZB.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and 0GZB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -45.15% | -40.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.33% | -14.66% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -18.57% | -28.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.47% | -42.85% | -39.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.74% | -3.05% | -58.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.31% | -15.40% | -35.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.81% | 4.71% | +13.10% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) at 7.03%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0GZB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | 0GZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.10% | 7.03% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.72% | 18.37% | +34.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.00% | 22.07% | +48.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.08% | 24.02% | +40.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.25% | 23.76% | +40.49% |
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than 0GZB.DE's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. 0GZB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor 0GZB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and 0GZB.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRH0.L is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRH0.L is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for 0GZB.DE.
XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while 0GZB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 1.20% for 0GZB.DE.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and 0GZB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer