PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0GZB.DE vs. FNGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0GZB.DE is traded in EUR, while FNGU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FNGU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0GZB.DE achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 28.77% return.


0GZB.DE

1D
0.84%
1M
5.18%
YTD
10.76%
6M
22.41%
1Y
42.38%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

FNGU

1D
-6.64%
1M
22.96%
YTD
28.77%
6M
9.27%
1Y
50.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 0GZB.DE and FNGU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0GZB.DE
0GZB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GZB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0GZB.DEFNGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

0.85

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

2.02

+10.06

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0GZB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0GZB.DE and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0GZB.DEFNGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

0.88

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.19

+0.44

Drawdowns

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0GZB.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GZB.DE and FNGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0GZB.DEFNGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.84%

-62.46%

+30.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-59.05%

+47.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-10.88%

+8.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-23.95%

+13.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

24.90%

-21.40%

Volatility

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNPP RICI Enhanced Kupfer (ER) EUR Hedge ETC (0GZB.DE) is 6.38%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 17.64%. This indicates that 0GZB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0GZB.DEFNGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

17.64%

-11.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

44.30%

-27.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

57.32%

-37.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.55%

79.43%

-58.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

79.43%

-58.94%

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

0GZB.DE has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

0GZB.DE vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither 0GZB.DE nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


0GZB.DE and FNGU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 0GZB.DE is cheaper at 1.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

0GZB.DE is cheaper with a 1.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

0GZB.DE is categorized as Metals, while FNGU is Leveraged Equities. 0GZB.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper (EUR Hedged), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for 0GZB.DE and 2.60% for FNGU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0GZB.DE and FNGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer